Becoming a man or woman has been understood as a natural process grounded firmly in biology, absolutely certain, immutable and indisputable. It can’t be a complex matter as they are simply descriptions of how matter naturally behaves and let alone self-evident.
How to know whether you are man or woman? Feel free to run this simple test. Take off your pants, and see what’s in there. If it’s vagina, you will most likely have a soprano voice, Mezzo-soprano or Contralto voice, as refers to typical female voice frequency ranges, if otherwise mean penis, most likely you have a countertenor voice, tenor voice, baritone voice or bass voice, as refers to typical male voice frequency ranges.
Too complicated? No. I’m not trying to insult your intelligence through any means, rather remind you about the things that you may have forgotten . Take the above test, we human have an odd tendency; to state the obvious. We normally does that when we have nothing better to say or trying to explain something to an idiot. But in my case, I’m assuming my reader know little bit of here and there about simple scientific process. So don’t be insulted if I cover what you have known, unless otherwise; you have your education level or system to blame, not me.
We both know and believe refers to above example, its clearly shows that if you have penis you are male by right, otherwise you are female by right. That’s is indisputable fact that we both know, hence there’s no need for argument. Eventually, ‘the right and wrong’ that we both know are quite consistent isn’t?
It is a simple matter after all.
But wait. Apparently, the problems we face is beyond the consistency of ‘the right and wrong’ we both know. You want us to agree the ‘against norms and violates the natural law’ acts are right to practise. What’s right to you are spared and what’s wrong to us are falsified. Hence that’s how it starts; from right to wrong, from wrong to right. Hence your understanding of what is ‘right to me’ is neither based on ‘what is wrong to you’ nor the judgments based on which evidence is ‘rightest’, but solely due to exercise your right that simply justify your actions .
Despite high acceptance of many cultures and many non-discrimination countries particularly western world to where homosexual acts have been legal, up to the right of marriage, LGBT people are still subject to social rejection, prejudice and discrimination in many parts of the world.
As of May 2011, there remain 75 countries worldwide notably throughout the countries that incorporate religious ethical and moral codes into their criminal law, criminalize consensual homosexual acts, which the maximum up to the death penalty. 75 countries can’t be wrong.
We have a big load of bullshit to deal with. Your bullshit allowed you to hold your viewpoint that free from other’s viewpoint, but not vice versa. You expect others to be a positive minded, and to have a world-class imagination to accept you as who you are, but not vice versa. You want others to take responsibility for the consequences of their decisions, but not vice versa. You want your voice to be heard and understood to the people of the world, but not vice versa. You value freedom only if it’s in line with your desires and fulfill your needs, but not vice versa.
You see, exercise your right can only exist with the absence of the right of others. Bloody hell isn’t?
(to be continued)